A recent Project: Reader Reaction question asked whether DWI checkpoints are the most effective means of preventing alcohol-related accidents.

Responses:

• “I don’t mind getting stopped, even though I don’t drink, if it will catch those few that do drink and drive. Of course, the state police could be more useful doing other things, but what is our priority?”
— Ardyth Elms

• “By having these checkpoints we have our officers visible with in-your-face confrontations. We not only cut down on DWI, but also they are catching other criminals that normally would go undetected. A visible law enforcement agency is a successful agency.”
— Doug McGregor

• “If DUI arrests are declining, then good for the state. But I’d like to see the statistics on the nightly checkpoints to gauge their efficacy. ...”
— Bill Zarges

• “The resources being put to use are being used wisely in my opinion. I have seen results at the sobriety checkpoints. I do believe the checkpoints should be rotated more often (and) perhaps even have two in one night, just different locations.”
— Christian Heller

• “I don’t think more checkpoints will reduce the number of drunken drivers. If the laws were enforced better and vehicles were taken away from drunken drivers that would send a message that drinking and driving is not OK. ...”
— Jeff Greene

• “We have all watched footage or read of crashes caused by someone drinking irresponsibly and ending the life or lives of innocent people. If these checkpoints stop only one person from endangering others, they are worth it. ...”
— Frank Dalton

• • •

Want to participate in Project: Reader Reaction? Contact Editor David Stevens at:

david_stevens@link.freedom.com